OpenAI has released a new AI chatting software, ChatGPT. Yet, it made its famous debut only shortly after the beginning of the new year. It has currently dwarfed down upon all the others, including Google, and is seen as one of the most dominant and prominent sources of information in the near future. Designed by Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Elon Musk, Ilya Sutskever, Wojciech Zaremba, and John Schulman, this phenomenal project has proved to become a worldwide sensation.
But what makes it so impressive? Even if it is only the beginning of a new no-Google-era? Well, one of the most substantial, yet not quite difficult, aspects is its ability to create human-like responses. All of us are used to Google, and we are able to perfectly understand how it talks, and why it talks that way.
Short answer: it’s a robot.
Long answer: there aren’t many other robots that we rely on to retrieve information.
I mean, really.
When ChatGPT was released, many people underestimated it, or even didn’t pay attention. Google was their primary source for them, and it wasn’t like this AI chatting function was going to do them any better, as if it would need to even hold a competition against Google.
But despite that Google was their best friend, it never really talked.
That’s why ChatGPT had a most successful way of intriguing users: to talk to them like a real person. To at least have some sense of emotion and have conversations most un-Google-like.
Yeah, Google is kind of the main hindrance for ChatGPT, and its main rival.
So until ChatGPT finally will overtake Google in the AI Race (like the Space Race), Google will have some time to make its last words.
If you’re interested, here is the link to the home page for OpenAI’s new ChatGPT:
https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
Another, well, critical (in both meanings) feature is that it is critical to itself, meaning that it is able to fix its own mistakes and admit it. But he will also sometimes say that he is the smartypants, and will challenge against you sometimes to when it adamantly believes that it is correct.
Like this:
Ah, but is 1 + 3 really five? And assuming the typos are not on purpose, I wouldn’t really hypothesise that 1 apple plus 3 apples would give me five apples.
Additionally, it may falter, and not really listen to you, like this:
*Sigh
Yep, ChatGPT may not always be one of the best sources to find one that will be strictly obedient to you.
And homework, you said? Well, to all the children out there, I don’t believe that ChatGPT is the best resource to do your homework, not mentioning that you shouldn’t be trying to find something that would in the first place. You could, sometimes try to get it to motivate you to do it yourself, like this:
ChatGPT can get a little confusing still…
Bruh.
Even someone who just copies from a book word-to-word could have done a better job than that. It didn’t really make much sense, and contradicted many times.
As I said, ChatGPT isn’t always reliable, but for now, it is the start of a better Google, and soon enough, there might even be a ChatAYQ?
Maybe, just, maybe.
Peace! ✌